www.buskeismus.de On his website Rolf Schälike writes about the processes of the 24th Civil Chamber of the .. Landgericht Hamburg Such reporting is in the public debate permitted this, the Court of Appeal in a decision (Case No.: 9 W 75/07) decided, confirming the previous decision of the Landgericht Berlin
statements to the social sphere of that. being reported, only in case of serious effects on the personal rights associated with negative sanctions be, for example, if a stigma, social exclusion or pillory effect are apprehended. ...( KG, Decision of 19.06.2007, Az: 9 W 75/07 ; via Swiss firm Prof. )
The defendant operates a website on which he holds the law including the oral proceedings (in particular) reports of the Regional Court of Hamburg and the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court in press matters, it evaluates and lists. He practices public criticism of the jurisdiction of such courts.
This effort by the defendant is a public preoccupation with the activity of these courts to accept. Find the defendant takes this claim for themselves, his concern in the public interest and to influence to follow on public opinion, this may in general the public are also only a relatively small degree feedback. In any event, by the defendant on his website and held a public presentation and discussion of the judicial function in particular of the Regional Court of Hamburg and the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court in the press classified as adequate means to enforce its own opinion in the intellectual discussion of Article 5 paragraph 1 sentence 1 GG is covered. ...
Under such a debate fueled by the defendant, which also includes the appearance and behavior of each process involved in the hearings, it is therefore permissible also with the name of the effort to represent an affected lawyer to prevent a critical and satirical reporting on the process behavior of the parties with legal means.
0 comments:
Post a Comment